Why Can't We All Just Get Along
Philippians 4:1-7
Last week we looked at the concept of
already/not yet, that Jesus already did everything that is needed for our
salvation, but that we are not yet in heaven. Jesus already paid the price for
our sins, and we await heaven and the transformation of our lowly bodies so
they will be like his glorious body. As we begin chapter four, it really
belongs with last week’s message – a summary, starting with a “therefore” and
reiterating the main point: that Paul dearly loves the people of the Philippian
Church and dearly desires that they stand firm in the faith, knowing that Jesus
has already paid their price and that their future is secure in Him.
And so, with this in mind, Paul
addresses an issue in this church. I
plead with Euodia and I plead with Syntyche to agree with each other in the
Lord. Yes, and I ask you, loyal yokefellow, help these women who have contended
at my side in the cause of the gospel, along with Clement and the rest of my
fellow workers, whose names are in the book of life.
It can be easy to think of these
women as troublemakers, as those who would sow seeds of dissention, as those
who would drive a church to ruin with their fighting. I have known various
people in various churches who seem to always be fighting with someone and the
common factor is always them. As I read over this, I have to admit that I
wanted to rail on some people who seem to be out for the demise of the church.
But Paul has already addressed that type of person last chapter, those who live
as enemies of the cross of Christ. So what is going on with Euodia and
Syntyche? Notice that the context in which Paul addresses them is immediately
following an appeal to his dear friends. Paul does not break context here. He
does not say, “On the other hand…” He does not say, “But there are some, such
as Euodia and Sytyche…” So remember that
these are two of his friends, those who have contended alongside him in the
cause of the gospel.
Sometimes we can get the wrong
impression of the place of women in the church. Historically there are some who
have used the Bible’s teaching to keep women silent and even to justify the
abuse of women and to ignore their unique call to ministry. The church in
Philippi was no such church. When you look back at the founding of this church,
you’ll find that Paul founded it with Lydia and a group of women who gathered
outside the city gate by the river (Acts 16:13-14). Women were afforded much
more opportunity in Macedonia, and Paul’s admonition to these women was not
that they stop teaching or anything else. These were two women who Paul
describes as having contended at his side for the cause of the gospel. So his
goal for them was that they would get agree with one another in the Lord.
Does this mean they have to be 100%
in agreement on everything? There are some things that are essential and some
things that are not. For Christians recently, it seems like the essentials are
often viewed as “suggestions.” That you can view Jesus as merely a “good teacher”
who died a martyr’s death, that there was no virgin birth, no miracles and no
bodily resurrection, and that he is not returning for his people. How exactly
is this Christianity?
There are some who believe that as
long as you’re “good enough” then you’re fine.
Or that there is no Heaven or Hell, or afterlife at all. I have a friend
who is a Universalist; he believes that God would never send anyone to Hell.
But he also admitted to me that he didn’t come to that belief from the Bible
and he agreed that the Biblical authors believed something else; that they were
clear that salvation only comes through Jesus Christ, the one way to the
Father. If it’s not true, then Jesus was, as C.S. Lewis put it, a liar or a
lunatic. The point here is that there are essential doctrines – if we undermine
them, we undermine the entire faith.
When it comes to Paul, you’ll find
that he was extremely forceful when it came to people who messed with essential
doctrines. Just read the letter to the Galatians and you’ll see how he felt
about essential doctrines. Hint: he comes out and tells those who are forcing
circumcision to go ahead and emasculate themselves. Yes, it’s in there.
Galatians 5:12 One of those verses we don’t have our kids memorize in
Children’s Church.
But there are other doctrines or
practices that are not essential. By this I mean there are things where the
Bible is not completely clear, and our salvation does not hang on which side we
fall. For example, one big debate I see all the time is between predestination
and free will. Predestination is the idea that God, in his sovereignty, decided
in advance everything that would happen, including who would be saved and who
would not be saved. Thus there is nothing we can do to affect our salvation. We
may think we have a choice, but it’s really God’s choice alone. This would
include Presbyterians, Reformed Christians, UCC, and some Baptists. Free will,
on the other hand, suggests that we choose whether or not to follow God. The
Holy Spirit woos us and draws us to Himself, but we have the ability to choose.
Who is right? The answer, though this
might be offensive to some of my hardcore Calvinist friends, is that it is not
essential to salvation.
Besides non-essential doctrines,
there are practices held by churches that are not essential. The Bible doesn’t
tell us exactly how to organize our services. It doesn’t say what kind of
instruments we should use – I couldn’t find “guitar” or “drums” in the Bible,
but I couldn’t find a piano or pipe organ either. Sometimes we get so fired up
over the non-essentials that we completely forget about the essentials. We
fight with each other about what kind of music is in the service and we neglect
the poor and needy. We debate endlessly about predestination versus free will,
while we fail to take the gospel to those who don’t know Jesus.
So Paul sees his friends, fellow
workers in the gospel, engaged in some sort of disagreement, so what does he
do? He calls them out! By name!
I have only named names once in a
sermon, and that was when leaders in the church were sinning, and only because
the Scripture tells us when a leader sins, the rebuke is public. But Paul’s
goal here is not public rebuke. His goal is for the church to help these two
women reconcile and to thus get back on track with being the church.
So I want to ask this: How do we
respond when we have disunity? When it comes down to it, we tend to be pretty dysfunctional.
We often base decisions on rumors and the hope of not offending anyone. We beat
around the bush and pretend that conflict doesn’t happen. Sometimes there are
bullies who are used to getting their way. Other times there are clergy persons
who distort the Word of God for their own good or use the pulpit to massage
their egos or build their own following.
I don’t like conflict. In fact, as a rule, my default setting is “conflict
avoider.” But one thing we can be sure of as humans is that before we die, we
will have conflict. Euodia and Syntyche were in the midst of conflict, and Paul
addresses it. Even he knows that
there are areas of conflict in which there might not even be a “right” and a “wrong”
side! But
And Paul does not forget that these
two women are not the enemy! Besides saying that they contended at his side for
the cause of the gospel, Paul includes them in the category of “fellow workers”
and, furthermore, he includes them as those whose names are written in the book
of life.
This is a reminder that we can have
disagreements in church. When our church council met to discuss if we would
continue to withhold a portion of our conference apportionment I was actually
happy that the vote wasn’t unanimous. We didn’t all agree, but neither did we
pretend to agree for the sake of the meeting and then whine and moan about it
out in the parking lot. I always ask a couple in pre-marital counseling how
they fight. This almost always gets interesting responses from the couple –
sometimes they’re all, “oh, we never
fight!” in which case I tell them that their assignment is to have a good fight
before the next appointment so they can tell me how they fight. Now, there are
good and bad ways to fight, but there are basically only two reasons why a
couple wouldn’t have disagreements. The first is because one is so forceful in
his or her opinions that the other wouldn’t dare state anything contrary for
fear of being put down. The second is because they don’t care enough about
anything to disagree.
The big question is: can we disagree
and still love one another? Can we disagree and put the disagreements that are non-essential
for salvation aside and work together for the cause of Christ? It can be easy
to forget that the other is not your enemy but is rather a brother or sister in
Christ.
And so Paul continues: Rejoice in the Lord always. I will say it
again: Rejoice!
I was going to end this sermon right
after we got through the disagreement between these two women, but I thought
about the way the scripture is organized and how it is organized this way not
just on purpose, but by the Holy Spirit.
Paul wants the church to be clear on
this point: rejoice in the Lord always. He says it again. And again. And again.
This is one of the main themes of the letter; to rejoice even when things aren’t
going the way you want them to go. But now I believe that this section also has
to do with how to deal with disagreement in the church as well.
When we disagree with one another
about the non-essentials, what would happen if we stopped and rejoiced in the
Lord? What would happen if this were our first response? To rejoice in the Lord
with one another? How about if that was what drove all of our Christian interaction – how good God is?! I have tried
to emphasize the first part of our prayer time when we rejoice with how God has
been at work in the previous week; if we sincerely take notice of what God is
doing and gave that first priority, everything else might look a little
different.
And as we rejoice together, Let your gentleness be evident to all. The
Lord is near. Of course we are going to be gentle with one another when we
are rejoicing and actively looking for things to rejoice in. They say if you
look at things like a hammer, everything looks like a nail. But conversely, when
your mind is set on positive things, you begin to see everything in a positive
light. And reflecting that the Lord is near is key. I remember in college, one
day a fraternity brother ran into me after a terrible class. He told me I
looked terrible, to which I responded by telling him how awful the class was.
Then I realized that my professor was standing right behind me. Yeah, that was
awkward. But how might our behavior change if we were to reflect on the
nearness of the Lord?
Paul gives a good clue: Do not be anxious about anything, but in
everything, by prayer and petition, with thanksgiving, present your requests to
God. And the peace of God, which transcends all understanding, will guard your
hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus.
God’s got it all under control.
Everything. This is how God’s people can be peaceful in times when it doesn’t
seem like you should be. Again, it’s all about Jesus.
Comments